On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 07:28:14AM -0400, Robert Martin wrote: > >> Voice is a no-no for me. Being French, I can't speak and understand > >> spoken English (and worst, American English...) well and fast enough > >> to hold a conversation in voice. > > > also unless im not mistaken holding it in Voice also guarantees that > there will not be a transcript of what was said. Unless there is now a > rock solid low lag real time way of transcribing the voice parts since > we are going to be discussing legal matters it needs to be recordable.
That is probably exactly the reason why they want it to be in voice: so that there is no transcript and nobody can use whatever is going to be said in court at a later time. It is meant to be "informational" only, which is probably not very useful indeed, unless the information flows both ways and this will lead to a change of the TPV policy. -- Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com> _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
