Morgaine,
Thanks for asking. My interest is to listen to specific concerns
voiced by the majority of the community and (more importantly)
take proposed solutions to those concerns under
advisement before the policy becomes effective on April 30. It won't
be very productive for anyone if it's just a grousing session about
legal theory or hypothetical situations that may or may not occur in
the future. Yes, I will take all serious proposals back into the
company for serious consideration. But, make no mistake, I'm not
asking for a change set that makes one person happier at a time. I'm
looking for the minimum change set that represents the broadest
possible consensus among the community of TPV authors.
So, yours are good questions, and I do intend to champion the TPV
community's collective voice in this process. I hope we emerge with
something actionable out of these meetings.
-- Joe
Morgaine wrote:
Joe, nowhere do you say that you are going to feed the
community response back to the people who drafted the TPV, in order to
seek change. Was that implied? Nor do you say that you are going to
champion the TPV community's needs with the appropriate Lindens after
your 3 meetings. Was that implied?
Although I would like to think that both of the above were implied,
your paragraph does not actually say that. It can also be read as
intending nothing more than a one-way process of explaining the intent
to us, calming the restless natives as it were. Could you please quash
this ungenerous reading, and state that your intention is indeed to get
the TPV document improved, and that you will do what you can to make
that happen?
Morgaine.
==================================
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Joe Linden <j...@lindenlab.com>
wrote:
Hello,
all. I've been reading the ongoing commentary here, on various blogs,
irc, and in-world groups about the recently introduced Third Party
Viewer Policy and Directory and I'd like to host an "office hour" or
informal brown bag to make the conversation a little more synchronous
for those who are interested. I plan to hold three of these over the
next couple of weeks, at times that might be friendlier for some than
others, but the first one will happen next Tuesday, 4/13 at noon PDT.
I'd like to address questions about the intent of the policy, how we
will be using the Directory going forward, and see if I can gather the
specific concerns that have been raised by the community over the past
several weeks. It'll be an informal Q&A session, held in voice, at
this location:
http://maps.secondlife.com/secondlife/Linden%20Estate%20Services/229/230/29
No RSVP needed, and feel free to rebroadcast the invite to others you
think would benefit from open dialog around the subject.
I hope to see many of you there next week.
-- Joe
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
privileges
|
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
