On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:43:42 +0200, Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com> wrote:
> That is probably exactly the reason why they want it to be in voice: > so that there is no transcript and nobody can use whatever is going > to be said in court at a later time. I want to make clear that I refuse this interpretation. This approach worries me even more than the policy itself. I think this is a non-costructive, negative and offensive approach, and it should be kept out of the debate. opensource obscure _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
