In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 26 Dec 2002 21:08:00 +0100, Andy 
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

appro> > maybe we should be using perl.
appro> 
appro> If it ought to be perl, then I'd rather get rid of $(CPP) altogether. In
appro> which case I'd implement elf-pic perlasm option and simply
appro> 
appro> asm/dx586-elf.o: asm/dx586-elf.s
appro>  $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $<
appro> 
appro> asm/dx586-elf.s: asm/des-586.pl
appro>  (cd asm; $(PERL) des-586.pl `echo elf or elf-pic` > dx586-elf.s)
appro> 
appro> and make sure perl emits universal code (i.e. no comments:-). Note that
appro> the first rule automatically covers for -b elf of yours:-)

How about reworking that for 0.9.8?  Or if you dare, for 0.9.7a?

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to