> appro> Yet I'd dare:-) If it was up to me and if Tim is with us [i.e. is ready > appro> to swiftly verify a snapshot on explicit request], I'd pull it [unified > appro> *586-elf.o rules] even now:-) I have Linux and Solaris/Intel, > appro> login.openssl.org is a FreeBSD machine... So shall we? > > I suggest not.
Oops! Missed smiley after "so shall we." I mean I'm not actually suggesting to pull it *now*. But I'm serious about 0.9.7a... > appro> As far as I can tell the only target that shouldn't work in > appro> 0.9.7-beta6 is sco5-gcc and only if you don't have GNU > appro> assembler around. The rest of targets should work. They lack > appro> assembler support, but they're operational. What is being > appro> discussed here is *proposed* patch adding support for assembler > appro> modules to the targets in question. > > OK, now I have a better picture. For some reason, I didn't see the > beginning of this thread. If sco5-gcc currently doesn't use any > assembler and "works" with such a configuration, Well, I meant that sco5-gcc is the only one [among ~16 being discussed] that *uses* assembler modules and *therefore* might not work *unless* gcc is configured to invoke gnu assembler. I don't know if gnu assembler is mandatory for gcc installation on SCO or is it optional like in Solaris. But in either case we can always point at no-asm. A. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
