I'm taking a look at it. Don't worry about RT "stripping" the attachment, that's just for outgoing email. The patch is in the database, and I just downloaded it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jul 18 13:33:56 2006]: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:26:29PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS > Whacker wrote: > > > > > OK. I suggest I prepare a patch that will not change them (they > will > > > be IPv4-only), will mark them with #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_DEPRECATED, > and > > > will not add them to the .pod. Sounds reasonable? > > > > Yes. > > > > > How about the problem of BIO_set_conn_ip/BIO_get_conn_ip being > > > IPv4-only? Do you prefer BIO_set_conn_ipv6/BIO_get_conn_ipv6 as > their > > > IPv6-only counterparts, or some other way? How heavily is BIO_* > used > > > and how heavily are BIO_set_conn_ip/BIO_get_conn_ip used? > > > > They aren't used at all in OpenSSL itself, as far as I can see. As > > for the rest of the world, your guess is as good as mine. > > > > They way they work, I think that IPv6 variants is the way to go. > > Greetings, > > the patch to change IPv4-only functions and structures to AF-agnostic > in the BIO part of openssl is attached to this mail (Reguest Tracker > will presumably strip it) and can also be found at > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198737 > > Comments, or inclusion in the openssl distribution, are welcome. > > Yours, -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
