> On Jun 15, 2017, at 5:57 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > > Sean Dague wrote: >> [...] >> I think those are all fine. The other term that popped into my head was >> "Friends of OpenStack" as a way to describe the openstack-hosted efforts >> that aren't official projects. It may be too informal, but I do think >> the OpenStack-Hosted vs. OpenStack might still mix up in people's head. > > My original thinking was to call them "hosted projects" or "host > projects", but then it felt a bit incomplete. I kinda like the "Friends > of OpenStack" name, although it seems to imply some kind of vetting that > we don't actually do.
Why not bring back the name Stackforge and apply that to unofficial projects? It’s short, descriptive, and unambiguous. -Chris > An alternative would be to give "the OpenStack project infrastructure" > some kind of a brand name (say, "Opium", for OpenStack project > infrastructure ultimate madness) and then call the hosted projects > "Opium projects". Rename the Infra team to Opium team, and voilà! > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev