On 2017-06-19 08:42:04 -0700 (-0700), Chris Hoge wrote: [...] > Why not bring back the name Stackforge and apply that to > unofficial projects? It’s short, descriptive, and unambiguous. [...]
Logistical points aside, that name is strikingly similar to another and previously much more popular but now defunct s.*forge source code hosting platform; that naming pattern can imply a fork of the original codebase, as is the case for gforge/fusionforge. "Unambiguous" is in the eye of the beholder. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
