On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Michael Still wrote:
>> [...] I think an implied side effect of
>> the runway system is that nova-drivers would -2 blueprint reviews
>> which were not occupying a slot.
>>
>> (If we start doing more -2's I think we will need to explore how to
>> not block on someone with -2's taking a vacation. Some sort of role
>> account perhaps).
>
> Ideally CodeReview-2s should be kept for blocking code reviews on
> technical grounds, not procedural grounds. For example it always feels
> weird to CodeReview-2 all feature patch reviews on Feature Freeze day --
> that CodeReview-2 really doesn't have the same meaning as a traditional
> CodeReview-2.
>
> For those "procedural blocks" (feature freeze, waiting for runway
> room...), it might be interesting to introduce a specific score
> (Workflow-2 perhaps) that drivers could set. That would not prevent code
> review from happening, that would just clearly express that this is not
> ready to land for release cycle / organizational reasons.
>
> Thoughts?

Agreed, especially if any member of a group can manipulate that value.
I don't like pinging people on vacation to remove procedural -2s.

Michael

-- 
Rackspace Australia

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to