On 11 Sep 2014, at 09:19, Mike Scherbakov <mscherba...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > what about using "experimental" tag for experimental features? > > After we implemented feature groups [1], we can divide our features and for > complex features, or those which don't get enough QA resources in the dev > cycle, we can declare as experimental. It would mean that those are not > production ready features. > Giving them live still in experimental mode allows early adopters to give a > try and bring a feedback to the development team. > > I think we should not count bugs for HCF criteria if they affect only > experimental feature(s). At the moment, we have Zabbix as experimental > feature, and Patching of OpenStack [2] is under consideration: if today QA > doesn't approve it to be as ready for production use, we have no other > choice. All deadlines passed, and we need to get 5.1 finally out. > > Any objections / other ideas? +1 -- Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala Sr. OpenStack Engineer tnapier...@mirantis.com _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
