Mike, i've just want to say, if feature isn't ready for production use and
we have no other choice, we should provide detailed limitations and
examples of proper use.

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Tomasz Napierala <tnapier...@mirantis.com>
wrote:

>
> On 11 Sep 2014, at 09:19, Mike Scherbakov <mscherba...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > what about using "experimental" tag for experimental features?
> >
> > After we implemented feature groups [1], we can divide our features and
> for complex features, or those which don't get enough QA resources in the
> dev cycle, we can declare as experimental. It would mean that those are not
> production ready features.
> > Giving them live still in experimental mode allows early adopters to
> give a try and bring a feedback to the development team.
> >
> > I think we should not count bugs for HCF criteria if they affect only
> experimental feature(s). At the moment, we have Zabbix as experimental
> feature, and Patching of OpenStack [2] is under consideration: if today QA
> doesn't approve it to be as ready for production use, we have no other
> choice. All deadlines passed, and we need to get 5.1 finally out.
> >
> > Any objections / other ideas?
>
> +1
>
> --
> Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala
> Sr. OpenStack Engineer
> tnapier...@mirantis.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to