On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:45:53PM +0300, Alexandre Levine wrote: > Daniel, > > On 2/2/15 12:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 07:57:08PM +0000, Tim Bell wrote: > >>Alex, > >> > >> > >> > >>Many thanks for the constructive approach. I've added an item to the list > >>for the Ops meetup in March to see who would be interested to help. > >> > >> > >> > >>As discussed on the change, it is likely that there would need to be some > >>additional > >>Nova APIs added to support the full EC2 semantics. Thus, there would need > >>to support > >>from the Nova team to enable these additional functions. Having tables in > >>the EC2 > >>layer which get out of sync with those in the Nova layer would be a > >>significant > >>problem in production. > >Adding new APIs to Nova to support out of tree EC2 impl is perfectly > >reasonsable. > >Indeed if there is data needed by EC2 that Nova doesn't provide already, > >chances > >are that providing this data woudl be useful to other regular users / client > >apps > >too. Just really needs someone to submit a spec with details of exactly which > >functionality is missing. It shouldnt be hard for Nova cores to support it, > >given > >the desire to see the out of tree EC2 impl take over & in tree impl removed. > > We'll do the spec shortly. > > > >>I think this would merit a good slot in the Vancouver design sessions so we > >>can > >>also discuss documentation, migration, packaging, configuration management, > >>scaling, HA, etc. > >I'd really strongly encourage the people working on this to submit the > >detailed spec for the new APIs well before the Vancouver design summit. > >Likewise at lesat document somewhere the thoughts on upgrade paths plans. > >We need to at least discuss & iterate on this a few times online, so that > >we can take advantage of the f2f time for any remaining harder parts of > >the discussion. > > We'll see about that also when all of the subjects we can think of or get > questions about are covered somewhere in docs or specs. By the way - how do > you usually do those online discussions? I mean what is the tooling?
I just mean discussions on this mailing list, or in the gerrit reviews for the spec and/or patches Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev