>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 9:50 PM, Tony Breeds <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:48:43PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> I won't be able to make the TC meeting this week because of travel, >> so I wanted to lay out my thoughts on the three PTL-less projects >> based on the outcome of the recent election (EC2-API, Winstackers, >> and Stable Maintenance). >> >> The EC2-API project doesn't appear to be very actively worked on. >> There is one very recent commit from an Oslo team member, another >> couple from a few days before, and then the next one is almost a >> month old. Given the lack of activity, if no team member has >> volunteered to be PTL I think we should remove the project from the >> official list for lack of interest. > > I don't like disclosing private communications but in this case I feel it's > appropriate. > > The Current PTL contacted the Election officials after the nomination period > closed and was instructed to reach out to the TC and community.
Ok, good. Assuming that happens, it shouldn't be a problem to keep the project official. As far as the features being removed from nova goes, the project wouldn't have been deleted, just delisted. > >> The Winstackers project is much more active in the repository, but >> there doesn't seem to be much traffic on the mailing list. It's not >> clear why no one signed up to be PTL, and I couldn't find a notice >> that the current PTL is not running. I'm tempted to suggest removing >> Winstackers from the official project list for lack of participation >> in project governance, but perhaps a probation period is in order >> since it's a relatively new team. Probation would depend on having >> the team find a PTL volunteer, of course. >> >> The situation with the Stable Maintenance team is ironically shaky. >> The outgoing PTL has entered the Nova PTL election, though he has >> said he would take up the Stable team work again if he does not >> become Nova PTL. That election will not be over until 24 March, so >> I think we should wait before taking any action. If Matt becomes >> Nova PTL, > > Given he's the only candidate I think it's reasonable to assume he'll become > the PTL in ~3 days :) Oh, I was sure I had seen more than one nomination go by. Sorry, Matt. :) > >> , and no other volunteer steps forward, I will take on the >> responsibilities, though I do want to keep the Stable team separate >> from the Release team. That said, I would very much prefer to have >> someone else be the Stable team PTL so I hope we can find a volunteer. > > So cards on the table, I'm interested in taking on the role. I didn't > nominate > because I thought that might be a little complex given I'm also acting as an > election official. I understand the sentiment. Thanks for volunteering now, you have my support. Doug > > Clearly[1] the TC can select a candidate, whomever that is I'm confident > Stable > Maintenance will continue to build momentum. > > Yours Tony. > > [1] > http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for-leaderless-programs.html > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
