Hello everyone, My name is Claudiu Belu, the current PTL for the Winstackers team. I apologize for missing such an important matter. It is a new project / team, I didn't expect to go through elections this cycle. I will be more careful in the future. As for the os-win, the project has been actively evolving and it is currently used in several projects: nova, cinder, ceilometer, networking-hyperv, compute-hyperv (os-brick, not yet due to the Feature Freeze), and we've solved some non-trivial, long lasting issues, and improved the overall performance greatly. The team is quite small, but there are new people joining in and attending the weekly Hyper-V meetings.
There are still things that can be done and there is still room for improvement. Which is why I would like to propose myself for the Winstackers PTL for Newton. We will be attending the OpenStack summit and we have one worksession. Again, I apologize for the inconvenience. Best regards, Claudiu Belu ________________________________________ From: Mike Perez [thin...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 5:33 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election][ec2-api][winstackers][stable] status of teams without PTL candidates On 12:33 Mar 21, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > On Mar 21, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Alexandre Levine <alexandrelev...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Doug, > > > > Let me clarify a bit the situation. > > Before this February there wasn't such a project at all. EC2 API was > > a built-in part of nova so no dedicated PTL was required. The built-in part > > got removed and our project got promoted. We're a team of 3 developers > > which nevertheless are committed to this support for year and a half > > already. The reason I didn't nominate myself is solely because I'm new to > > the process and I thought that first cycle will actually start from Mitaka > > so I didn't have to bother. I hope it's forgivable and our ongoing support > > of the code to make sure it works with both OpenStack and Amazon will make > > up for it if a little. > > Yes, please don't take my original proposal as anything other than me > suggesting some "clean up" based on me not having all the info about the > status of EC2. If we need to clarify that all projects are expected to > participate in elections, that's something we can address. I'll look at > wording of the existing requirements in the next week or so. If the team has > a leader, you're all set and I'm happy to support keeping EC2 an official > team. Hope this cover things: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295581 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295609 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295611 -- Mike Perez __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
