Rebecca Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now that everyone should have had a chance to give their opinion, I'm going to > try to sum up the arguments from both sides, both for and against the two main > suggestions: repository and installation source. If anyone thinks I missed > any points, please respond as soon as possible. I'd like to reach a decision > by the end of the week so development and documentation have plenty of time to > implement any changes needed. This means that if you have points to change > in > this list, I need them by Wednesday so I can take them into consideration. > > > Installation Source > ------------------- > > > Advantages > ---------- > > Likely to be understandable to new users (installation source=source of > installation=what you install from) > Applicable to any acceptable installation media or other format, including > future development > Familiar to long-time SUSE users > Less work to implement (already used in documentation and in large parts of > YaST) > > > Disadvantages > ------------- > > Possible confusion with program sources > openSUSE source tree uses "inst_source" as the distributed media
Rebecca, I don't understand exactly what you mean with the above line. Could you explain this a bit better, please? thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
pgpyi695PDHgc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
