Rebecca Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Disadvantages >> > ------------- >> > >> > Possible confusion with program sources >> > openSUSE source tree uses "inst_source" as the distributed media >> >> Rebecca, I don't understand exactly what you mean with the above line. >> Could you explain this a bit better, please? > > jdd said: > >> On openSUSE tree, >> inst_source is a freezed folder (the one used when the distro is released)
openSUSE 10.2 does not have in it's tree the name "inst_source" anywhere, see ftp.opensuse.org/pub/distribution/10.2 for details. > > This can cause confusion if it is used to refer to the initial release of the > distribution, which it sounds like jdd is saying it is. That isn't the only > valid type of installation source. > > Does that explain it well enough or would you like more explanation of my > reasoning? That explains it - I was confused about where this come from. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
pgp0I4x8X8YnA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
