Inline...

---------------------------------------------------------
Joseph B. Ottinger                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://enigmastation.com                    IT Consultant

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Rickard Öberg wrote:

> Patrick Lightbody wrote:
>
> > >FWIW, from the discussions I've seen so far between the two of you,
> > >Maurice has my vote on all counts.
> >
> > Great. What is the reason for that?
>
> Because he's been saying "Why?" all along, and I agree. Why?

Rickard, with all due respect, Pat's been SAYING why... and others (myself
included) haven't had a problem recognizing it. The reason is because you
assume that the current dispatchers are ENOUGH, when apparently they're
not... and Pat's trying to make it so that the current dispatchers can be
used by those for whom it's satisfactory (like you, apparently, and
definitely like li'l ol' me) and advanced, super-custom dispatchers can be
used by those for whom the current set is NOT enough.

That's not a loss. That's a win.

> > Rickard, you were for a generic command framework. I remember this. Every
> > effort Maurice has made has inhibited that change in direction. There
> > is no
> > other way to say it.
> Ok.

I'm going to pretend I'm not reading this particular thread, LA LA LA... I
get enough of this crap out of my kids at home.

> > Of course not. I'm try to see that I am at my wits end. It is much easier
> > for me to "do it myself" then to waste even one more second trying to
> > convince people that aren't willing to dig a bit deeper (even in to
> > code in
> > CVS, not even new ideas).
>
> Ok.
>
> As I'm not totally up on what you're talking about, I don't really have
> many more comments on it. Do you have any suggestions as to what emails
> I should be looking at? (I've only followed the list briefly the last
> month or so)


Uh... wait a minute. You just said you supported Maurice... yet you aren't
up on what's being talked about? Then why are you supporting Maurice? Why
are you supporting ANYONE in the discussion if you aren't paying
attention? Wouldn't that call for more of an abstention?



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to