Can someone make a list comparing the three? That way we can see what each one gives us. I'm sure Maurice would have preferred JSTL's EL, and when JSP 2.0 comes out, most people will expect the standard as well.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Patrick Lightbody wrote: > So the current XWork code uses the existing WW expression language as is, > only using Ognl for setting/getting properties as well as type conversion. I > was playing with making an OgnlValueStack and it's literally 10 lines of > code and MUCH faster. I was thinking that between JSTL and Ognl, the need > for the WW EL might be pretty low. As I've stated before, WebWork->XWork > migration should be a drop-in replacement, no code changes or configuration > tweaks. So that means the WW EL will still be around, but what do you guys > think of starting to promote Ognl as the query language of choice? > > The only feature not quite in the OgnlValueStack (and I'm working on this) > is the concept of moving up levels from the stack head via "..". So asking > for "../name" isn;t recognized. Anyway, just throwing the idea out there. > Whatcha think? > > -Pat > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
