Good question, I'll take a look in to this some more and get back to ya'll
:)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Ottinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl as replacement for WW EL


> What's the impact of considering the JSP 2.0 EL? What capabilities are
> lost?
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
>
> > Yes, I assume you could do that as well, though I think that would be
pretty
> > confusing, since expressions in view layers (JSP, velocity) tend to be
> > static in nature, so I doubt "[someInt].someVal" would ever crop up.
> >
> > As for using the other expression language, yes, Ognl supports any kind
of
> > expression tree (Node interface), but that would be a lot of work to
> > implement the WW EL in to Ognl's form. An easier way (and this will be
> > included for backwards compatibility) would be to just include the old
> > ValueStack code as well.
> >
> > However, by using Ognl we gain not having to maintian our own EL and a
whole
> > bunch of speed, as well as more powerful features (Ognl can even do
lamba
> > expressions). The only cost is switching your brain to use "." instead
of
> > "/" and "[1]" instead of "../".
> >
> > -Pat
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "boxed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 12:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl as replacement for WW EL
> >
> >
> > > > "[1].name" -- "../name"
> > >
> > > does this mean you can do [someInt].name? In any case I find the WW EL
> > > syntax clearer. Is it possible to plug in a different parser to OGNL
that
> > > takes WW syntax instead?
> > >
> > > Anders Hovmöller
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://boxed.killingar.net
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Joseph B. Ottinger                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://enigmastation.com                    IT Consultant
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to