I completly agree on all the points you said concerning not be able to make
a 100% switch to XWork from WebWork with no code changes.

what I wanted to say is my concern regarding the changes in the EL format we
were discussing ('.' instead of '/' etc.). this would allow me to not make
to much changes in my views.

but if this is really not possible (specific ognl) or if it would break up
completely the good design it's clear to me that we should forget the ww el
adaption.... but if it is possible why not do it...

-Paolo

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 8:42 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl as replacement for WW EL
>
>
>Vedovato Paolo wrote:
>> I think that it's a very important point to be able to 
>switch to XWork
>> without having code changes AND to have all the improvements (like
>> performance etc.).
>
>Hm... not sure if that's realistic. Switching with minimal 
>code changes, 
>yes, but with no code changes I don't know. For example, *Aware 
>interfaces should be gone. We might want to reconsider how context and 
>pre/post processing is done too. For example, it would be entirely 
>possible to use Action implementation wrappers instead of 
>ActionFactory 
>delegates (i.e. do stuff on execute() instead of on 
>getAction()). Since 
>I think most of us are seeing needs for that already (e.g. validation, 
>security, various pre-processing) that would be a nice way to 
>handle it. 
>And it could also be an alternative way to do chaining.
>
>> So if there is extra work to achieve this it should really 
>be considered.
>> That would lead to a really fast usage of XWork through the WebWork
>> community.
>
>Really Fast Usage of XWork is not the primary concern IMHO. I 
>would MUCH 
>rather have XWork be AS GOOD as it can be from both design and 
>performance point of views, and have usage delayed somewhat. Having a 
>compromised solution that only goes half the way is only going to hurt 
>in the end.
>
>/Rickard
>
>-- 
>Rickard Öberg
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Senselogic
>
>Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to