I think that it's a very important point to be able to switch to XWork
without having code changes AND to have all the improvements (like
performance etc.).

So if there is extra work to achieve this it should really be considered.
That would lead to a really fast usage of XWork through the WebWork
community.

-Paolo

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 9:51 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl as replacement for WW EL
>
>
>Hrm - is / used for anything already in OGNL?
>
>If not, could we get it to use both - that way we'd be able to 
>have OGNL
>replace WW EL seamlessly? Or are there other differences?
>
>-mike
>
>On 29/12/02 7:28 PM, "Patrick Lightbody" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
>penned the
>words:
>
>> Update:
>> 
>> Drew Davidson is going to work on making the parser identiy 
>Strings using
>> single quotes as well, so this shouldn't be a problem much 
>longer. Also, it
>> appears that with maps (though this still wouldn't solve 
>other cases where
>> Strings are needed), you can do:
>> 
>> "someMap.foo" -> getSomeMap().get("foo")
>> 
>> Personally, I think just adding in single-quote support 
>would be the best
>> bet for us. So that means the last unresolved issue would be 
>".." stuff --
>> basically the ability to move the frame of context in the 
>value stack.
>> 
>> -Pat
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 9:37 AM
>> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl as replacement for WW EL
>> 
>> 
>>> Patrick Lightbody wrote:
>>>> You can find more about the syntax at www.ognl.org, but 
>here are some
>>>> examples compared to WebWork:
>>>> 
>>>> Ognl -- WebWork
>>>> --------------------
>>>> "name" -- "name" :)
>>>> "person.name" -- "person/name"
>>>> "map["blah"]" -- "map['blah']"
>>> 
>>> How does this work in JSP's? <foo bar="map["blah"}"/> isn't going to
>>> work for obvious reasons.
>>> 
>>> /Rickard
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>>> Welcome to geek heaven.
>>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>> Welcome to geek heaven.
>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to