Depends on the use. I don't think there'd be a problem eventually allowing Jelly's use, but depending on Jelly would be a Bad Thing.
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Kelvin Tan wrote: > Did a search in the archives and didn't find anything noteworthy re: WW + > Jelly, so thought I'd bring it up. > > Has this been discussed before? Perhaps not just using it as "another view", > but in a more integrated fashion, ala OGNL and the current EL? After all, Jelly > has a large collection of existing taglibs, and support for JEXL... > > Regards, > Kelvin > > -------- > The book giving manifesto - http://how.to/sharethisbook > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
