I have to disagree with Hani here. I think Jelly looks cool. I agree
that the Jakarta projects tend to be overly interconnected, but this
doesn't seem too bad. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 7:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FW: [OS-webwork] Commons Jelly
> 
> 
> Another view option with our existing EL then :)
> 
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:30:30 -0000
> To: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Commons Jelly
> 
> FWIW, you could drop in OGNL (or indeed any expression 
> language) into Jelly pretty easily if you wish. Any 
> TagLibrary can decide which expression langauges it wishes to 
> use & where so you could easily use Jelly + OGNL as a view 
> technology in WW if thats what you wanted to do.
> 
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 3:16 PM
> Subject: FW: [OS-webwork] Commons Jelly
> 
> 
> > More Jelly opinions.
> >
> > -mike
> >
> > ------ Forwarded Message
> > From: Kelvin Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:46:15 +0800
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Commons Jelly
> >
> > My initial inkling was to have Jexl as a possible replacement to the
> current
> > EL, but looking deeper into OGNL convinces me that it 
> doesn't match up 
> > in terms of functionality.
> >
> > Something interesting, though, is Jelly's support for multiple 
> > expression languages...
> >
> > <quote>
> > Jelly has native support for a Velocity-like expression language 
> > called
> Jexl
> > <snip> as well as support for other pluggable expression languages 
> > like XPath via Jaxen, JavaScript, beanshell and Jython.
> > </quote>
> >
> > Use Jelly as a basis for multiple EL support? But I have a strange 
> > feeling I'm way over my head here..:-) Just ignore me, if 
> that's the 
> > case.
> 
> You could drop in OGNL (or indeed any expression language) 
> pretty easily if you wish.
> 
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 23:07:49 -0800, Patrick Lightbody said:
> > >Can you give some deeper examples of how this might occur? I'm 
> > >thinking it could just be a view technology, so maybe you 
> can show me 
> > >other examples where it is "more than a view".
> > >
> > >-Pat
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Kelvin Tan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <opensymphony- 
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 
> > >10:27 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] Commons Jelly
> > >
> > >
> > >>Did a search in the archives and didn't find anything noteworthy
> > >>re: WW + Jelly, so thought I'd bring it up.
> > >>
> > >>Has this been discussed before? Perhaps not just using it as 
> > >>"another
> > >view",
> > >>but in a more integrated fashion, ala OGNL and the 
> current EL? After 
> > >>all,
> > >Jelly
> > >>has a large collection of existing taglibs, and support 
> for JEXL...
> > >>
> > >>Regards, Kelvin
> > >>
> > >>--------
> > >>The book giving manifesto     - http://how.to/sharethisbook
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>-------------------------------------------------------
> > >>This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise 
> Edition + 
> > >>IBM + LinuxWorld
> > >http://www.vasoftware.com
> > >>_______________________________________________ Opensymphony- 
> > >>webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >-------------------------------------------------------
> > >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise 
> Edition + 
> > >IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com
> > >_______________________________________________ 
> Opensymphony-webwork
> > >mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> > http://www.vasoftware.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
> > ------ End of Forwarded Message
> >
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to