Why he thinks it would be bad to depend on Jelly? So far, there hasn't been a good case as to how it could benefit xwork/webwork, and even if it did add a little, we try to keep dependencies to a minimum. A bunch of dependencies is too jakarta-ish, as someone put it.
--Erik On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Kelvin Tan wrote: > Care to elaborate on why you think so? > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 03:40:57 -0500 (EST), Joseph Ottinger said: > >Depends on the use. I don't think there'd be a problem eventually > >allowing Jelly's use, but depending on Jelly would be a Bad Thing. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
