-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/01/10 09:40, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > These are very valid concerns... even if all else goes smoothly, there's > probably lots of "noise" on the #openvpn channel. Any objections against > moving the meeting(s) to #openvpn-discussion?
Right now, I'm not sure what's the best. I really think we're being a bit unstructured, unclear and maybe a bit too flexible - changing things constantly just a few days before the meeting, may cause some confusion to what's really going to happen. That will not benefit anything. Samuli, I would say you should take this decision, but rather asap. If nothing is changed, we can move the meeting from #openvpn to another channel after the meeting has really started. But if really changes, it should be decided *now* and be communicated immediately. There are pro and contra points to both staying in #openvpn and to move to #openvpn-discussion. For me what is chosen, is less important. It is much more important to me that we actually do have these discussions. kind regards, David Sommerseth -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktHEUEACgkQDC186MBRfrpTvgCeNLPSm57U+cUbfQDmCpclYus0 hLQAoKnGO27ftUDa32fsIurw/3blCXwl =yqRV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
