David Sommerseth wrote: > On 08/01/10 09:40, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > > These are very valid concerns... even if all else goes smoothly, there's > > probably lots of "noise" on the #openvpn channel. Any objections against > > moving the meeting(s) to #openvpn-discussion? > > Right now, I'm not sure what's the best. I really think we're being a > bit unstructured, unclear and maybe a bit too flexible - changing things > constantly just a few days before the meeting, may cause some confusion > to what's really going to happen. That will not benefit anything. > > Samuli, I would say you should take this decision, but rather asap. If > nothing is changed, we can move the meeting from #openvpn to another > channel after the meeting has really started. But if really changes, it > should be decided *now* and be communicated immediately. > > There are pro and contra points to both staying in #openvpn and to move > to #openvpn-discussion. For me what is chosen, is less important. It is > much more important to me that we actually do have these discussions. > > > kind regards, > > David Sommerseth As we don't have much time, I'll move the discussion to #openvpn-discussion and send email to the lists. Could somebody change the channel topic on #openvpn just prior to the meeting (as suggested by Peter)? I'll monitor the #openvpn channel to catch those who did not read their emails prior to the meeting.
-- Samuli Seppänen Community Manager OpenVPN Technologies, Inc irc freenode net: mattock
