Thanks Sven, this was the section I missed! Sincerely,
Joe Bergmark On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Sven Linstaedt < [email protected]> wrote: > From 8.1.2: > > If a decorator applies to a managed bean, and the bean class is declared > final, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a > deployment problem, as defined in Section 12.4, “Problems detected > automatically by the container”. > > I have not found something similar in the interceptor chapter, but > regarding > the point interceptors and decorators can be handled technically in a > similar way, I believe this restriction also applies to interceptors. > > br, Sven > > > > 2009/10/28 Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > > > Maybe using bytecode injection does the trick :) > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Joseph Bergmark <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 10:33:01 PM > > Subject: Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent > Scoped > > Beans > > > > Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but if you use a subclass to implement > > interceptors/decorators doesn't that stop you from doing so on classes > that > > are final? I know there is a proxy restriction on final classes, but not > > aware of a restriction on decorators/interceptors. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Joe Bergmark > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > FYI. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > > > From: Gavin King <[email protected]> > > > To: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > > > Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:49:53 PM > > > Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped > > > Beans > > > > > > Yes, this is required and useful. > > > > > > However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied > > > via the "client proxy" that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is > > > written to allow the interception to be implemented without any > > > separate proxy object at all (using a subclass). > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > Hi; > > > > > > > > > > > > Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators > > > should > > > > not be called for dependent scoped beans? > > > > > > > > Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent > > scoped > > > > beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using > proxy > > > and > > > > @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy. > > > > > > > > Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans > are > > > > useful or necessary? > > > > > > > > Thanks; > > > > > > > > --Gurkan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > weld-dev mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Gavin King > > > [email protected] > > > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin > > > http://hibernate.org > > > http://seamframework.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
