On 2/15/16 15:16, Warren Kumari wrote:
This is the third of 3 messages to determine what the OpsAWG should do
with TACACS+.
If the answer to the previous question is yes, should the RFC describing
the protocol itself (as opposed to any other document that might
describe appropriate use) be published as a standards track RFC?
I would rather see it be a standard, but I would be perfectly happy to
see it published, in the current implementation, as an informational RFC
(as stated in my previous answer).
In either event, I feel this work should continue, especially the
security enhancements.
Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
