On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> If it is only an accurate description of the currently deployed protocol, > I couldn't care less whether it's Proposed Standard or Informational, as > long as the IETF can make derivative works. It seems to me that 'proposed standard' is ok here, provided we outrun the IPR torpedo. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
