Yes. From: OPSAWG <[email protected]> on behalf of Warren Kumari <[email protected]> Date: Monday, February 15, 2016 at 12:16 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [OPSAWG] Detangling - Q3: Publish TACACS+ as a standards track RFC?
This is the third of 3 messages to determine what the OpsAWG should do with TACACS+. If the answer to the previous question is yes, should the RFC describing the protocol itself (as opposed to any other document that might describe appropriate use) be published as a standards track RFC? Scott, Tianran and Warren _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
