I'm a little concerned that what's taking place has the appearance of voting, and I hope that the minority viewpoint will be weighed on its merit.
That said, I think it's very clearly the case that TACACS+ ought to be published (indeed, probably needs to be published) given its ubiquity and our interest in interoperability. I don't much care how (mostly because I'm unconvinced that anybody not involved with the IETF cares very much about the distinctions we make), but I do think that being careful about process helps protect the working group and the broader organization against appeals and such, which are a time and energy sink. But the bottom line is: I think it needs to be published as an RFC. Melinda _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
