Yes -- Tassos
Warren Kumari wrote on 15/2/16 22:16: > This is the third of 3 messages to determine what the OpsAWG should do with > TACACS+. > > If the answer to the previous question is yes, should the RFC describing the > protocol itself (as opposed to any other document that might describe > appropriate use) be published as a standards track RFC? > > Scott, Tianran and Warren > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
