I've been following this work and believe it is something the IETF should work on and that this is better than a good starting point for working group work. I can't promise that I will devote much attention to the work as it progresses, but I will participate in occasional reviews. I've talked to Eliot about some of the privacy trade-offs involved and I believe he understands my concerns. Adrian Dear OPSAWG,
The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. Manufacturer Usage Description Specification: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the technology described in the document. Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course). Regards, Warren and Tianran
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
