I would agree. > On Aug 3, 2016, at 5:38 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/3/16 03:14, Zhoutianran wrote: >> Dear OPSAWG, >> >> The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the >> following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. >> Manufacturer Usage Description Specification: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud >> >> >> The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by >> August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or >> implement or deploy the technology described in the document. >> >> Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our >> IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or >> have serious objections (with explanation of course). > > I feel this work should be adopted, and opsawg is a good place for it. > > Joe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
