I support the adoption of this draft, and consider myself properly warned regarding future requests for reviews. :-)
Thanks, Brian > On Aug 10, 2016, at 8:20 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just a reminder that this call for adoption is still ongoing, and > closes on August 16th. > > So far we see strong support for adoption, but would welcome more[0]. > > W > [0]: Partly so we have a pool of victims^w volunteers to ask for review. > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Zhoutianran <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dear OPSAWG, >> >> The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the >> following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. >> Manufacturer Usage Description Specification: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud >> >> >> The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by >> August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or >> implement or deploy the technology described in the document. >> >> Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our >> IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or >> have serious objections (with explanation of course). >> >> Regards, >> Warren and Tianran > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg -- Brian Weis Security, CSG, Cisco Systems Telephone: +1 408 526 4796 Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
