Thanks, Warren.  Before we do that, I would like to make two proposals,
to keep things moving (and I'm not quite sure of order here);

First, and hopefully most trivially, I propose just to capture a point
or two more from the expired informational document.  This would be
non-normative text.  I think much of it is there, but would like to
remove the outdated reference.   Should take a few days.

Second, and hopefully not that more of a controversy, I would like to
request early IANA assignments to assist with interoperable
development.  These would be listed in the IANA considerations section
of the current draft.  If we need a WG draft to make this happen, that's
fine with me, but we should do a quick rev after the assignments.

Eliot

On 8/16/16 9:33 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Dear OpsAWG,
>
> We see sufficient interest to go play in the MUD.
>
> Authors, please resubmit the document named draft-ietf-opsawg-mud (or
> something similar, this ain't yer first rodeo).
>
> While I have folks attention -- please remember to also review the
> TACACS+ document - we wish to WGLC it soon.
>
>
> W
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Zhoutianran <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dear OPSAWG,
>>
>> The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the 
>> following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
>> Manufacturer Usage Description Specification:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud
>>
>>
>> The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by 
>> August 16. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or 
>> implement or deploy the technology described in the document.
>>
>> Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our 
>> IETF96 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or 
>> have serious objections (with explanation of course).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Warren and Tianran
>
>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to