On 8/17/16 4:17 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > > On Wednesday, August 17, 2016, Eliot Lear <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Thanks, Warren. Before we do that, I would like to make two > proposals, > to keep things moving (and I'm not quite sure of order here); > > First, and hopefully most trivially, I propose just to capture a point > or two more from the expired informational document. This would be > non-normative text. I think much of it is there, but would like to > remove the outdated reference. Should take a few days. > > > Sure. > > > > > Second, and hopefully not that more of a controversy, I would like to > request early IANA assignments to assist with interoperable > development. These would be listed in the IANA considerations section > of the current draft. If we need a WG draft to make this happen, > that's > fine with me, but we should do a quick rev after the assignments. > > > I believe that this *can* be accomplished without it being a WG doc, > but it is better / cleaner / easier if we make it a WG doc and then > ask for early assistant. We are fine with lots of revisions / it being > submitted and then quickly revised.
Ok. Will publish shortly what we have. > > Oh, please also confirm (all authors) that any needed IPR disclosures > have been made... From my perspective, this is the case. Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
