Hi Luca,

I do agree. As a new user scoping out the alternatives (Neo4J, ArangoDB, or 
going back to Mongo or Postgres), there are a few barriers IMO:

   - *Documentation*
      - It should be *extremely* trivial to set up a basic instance. For 
      example, what if the last section of the main GitHub page 
      <https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb> contained a "Quick 
      Start" section that gets one started with and extremely simple database 
      from scratch...
         - 
         wget 
http://www.orientechnologies.com/download/orientdb-community-latest.tar.gz
         - unzip ...
         - run console.sh...
         - CREATE DATABASE remote:localhost/my_db
         - CONNECT remote:localhost/my_db root PASS_LOCATED_IN_CONFIG_XML
         - CREATE CLASS MyClass
         - ...
         - This would make it very quick for someone new to get up and 
         running instantly without doing work, and I know I don't speak for 
myself 
         when I say developers love less input and more output
         - You could also just add this to "Easy to install and use"
      - Focus more on letting people try it than explaining about it
         - Kill "But wasn't OrientDB an ODBMS", "Why yet another NoSQL" 
         sections
         - Add in use cases, which leads me to my next point
      - *Case Studies*
      - I don't even know if there are any, and if there aren't, spend time 
      working with companies that have built a name in their field (as big as 
you 
      can find)
         - Have an "Examples" section with vastly different use cases, eg. 
         social network, enterprise software, etc.
         - Personally, my company is about to announce valley funding and 
         be a big player in health & fitness, social, mobile, and consumer, and 
         after I have it up and running I would gladly give a juicy case study. 
The 
         reason we didn't give one to Parse.com is because I was having 
         problems scaling with their tech and knew we would be off of it soon. 
I'm 
         also organizing a meetup group in Toronto 
         <http://www.meetup.com/OrientDB-Toronto/> to raise awareness and 
         add to the community. If we appear on TechCrunch again 
         <http://techcrunch.com/2014/05/21/pumpup-exits-beta/> and are 
         shown to be using OrientDB, that's convincing, especially for SV 
startups.
      - Continuously update these as your case studies include larger and 
      larger brands
   - *Help*
      - This more of a personal opinion, but I know all of my developer 
      friends (from University of Waterloo and SV) use StackOverflow, and 
seeing only 
      241 tagged questions 
      <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/orient-db?sort=newest> is 
      generally a red flag. I would recommend switching this group over to 
using 
      Stack Overflow as it is already a central Q&A and also markets 
      technologies; more popular technologies generally have more popular tags.
   - *Presence*
      - Having a presence in Silicon Valley is generally a good thing. I'm 
      not sure what the funding situation is for OrientDB, but if you can raise 
a 
      round like Neo4J and expand to build an office in the valley, that will 
do 
      wonders for both marketing and finding great talent.
   
I have high hopes for OrientDB and strongly believe that it has a bright 
future ahead. A huge thanks to the team on their hard work so far from the 
entire community. We at PumpUp wish you great success!

On Tuesday, July 1, 2014 5:43:00 AM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Luca, hi!
>
> As an illustration of the case: while reading this thread I was sure it is 
> current and started just few days ago.
> And then... surprise.
>
> What I think we really need for promotion - is good reason for cites from 
> specialists and "big" names as well. And I think that some other 
> killer-feature ideas apart just "graphdb" are vital in this situation. 
>
> Personally from my side - I like idea of OrientDB very much, you know, and 
> you bought us by idea and we are ready to buy product as we even considered 
> to use it as foundation of our current project...
> But while we could deal with documentation so far (not as solid, as it 
> could be, but it is ok for a while), while we are not interested how much 
> money you've gathered from investors (but this might convince others, less 
> technical speakers), in my honest opinion - the robustness and stability 
> are what OrientDB should be able to sell at first place now.
> That is the feature, which will definitely kill any database product if it 
> is not first class property of this product.
>
> Thank you for the great product, indeed and I hope we will have real 
> chance to help you make it the best one.
>
> Ata
>
> суббота, 21 июня 2014 г., 19:30:54 UTC+5 пользователь Lvc@ написал:
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>> What are you referring?
>>
>> Lvc@
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20 June 2014 15:20, Daniel Cardin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> it would be nice to revisit this topic. What do you think Luca? Want a 
>>> new discussion about the current state of OrientDB ? 
>>>  
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to