On 28 Mar 2006 at 12:05, Bernard Li wrote: > Anything in your /home/oscartst/pvm/pvm.err?
Empty. But I see that # echo $PVM_ARCH is empty. I logged out, then back in. Now PVM_ARCH is LINUX and the test results are: [FAIL] 2006-03-28T15:11:23Z pvmd-path-ls.apt [PASS] 2006-03-28T15:11:23Z envvar-pvm_arch.apt [PASS] 2006-03-28T15:11:23Z envvar-pvm_root.apt [FAIL] 2006-03-28T15:11:23Z pvmd-path-which.apt [PASS] 2006-03-28T15:11:23Z modulecmd-path-ls.apt [PASS] 2006-03-28T15:11:23Z pvm-module-list.apt [PASS] 2006-03-28T15:11:23Z pvm-module-show-pvm_rsh.apt [PASS] 2006-03-28T15:11:23Z pvm-module-show-pvm_arch.apt [PASS] 2006-03-28T15:11:23Z pvm-module-show-pvm_root.apt > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > John Meskes > > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:02 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] LAM/MPI > > > > Hi Bernard: > > Thanks. the LAM/API passes the Step 8 Test now. > > Now I'm starting to look at all the pvm test failures. > > > > /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:398: > > FutureWarning: hex()/oct() of negative int will return a > > signed string in > > Python 2.4 and up > > return "<%s at %s>" % (cname, hex(id(self))) > > [PASS] 2006-03-28T14:36:04Z pvmd-path-ls.apt > > [FAIL] 2006-03-28T14:36:04Z envvar-pvm_arch.apt > > [FAIL] 2006-03-28T14:36:04Z envvar-pvm_root.apt > > [FAIL] 2006-03-28T14:36:05Z pvmd-path-which.apt > > [PASS] 2006-03-28T14:36:05Z modulecmd-path-ls.apt > > [FAIL] 2006-03-28T14:36:05Z pvm-module-list.apt > > [FAILDEP] 2006-03-28T14:36:05Z [pvm-module-show.apb] failed > > dependency(s). > > [FAILDEP] 2006-03-28T14:36:05Z [pvm-module-list.apt] expected > > [PASS] but got [FAIL] > > > > On 28 Mar 2006 at 0:54, Bernard Li wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi John: > > > > > > I took a careful look at your error message, it seems that > > it failed to find the "laminfo" command > > > and it erroneouslyreported that the SSI module was not > > found - perhaps you can file a bug on > > > this. > > > > > > I found that there was an error with the original SRPM, > > (where you won't be able to locate the > > > LAM/MPI binaries) - I have fixed it - try rebuilding with > > the following SRPM and see if it works > > > better for you: > > > > > > http://www.bcgsc.ca/downloads/oscar/lam-oscar-7.1.2-3.src.rpm > > > > > > Please also make sure that you have version 7.1.2 of the > > lam-switcher-modulefile RPM installed. > > > > > > If built/installed correctly, the command 'which laminfo' > > should give back: > > > > > > /opt/lam-7.1.2/bin/laminfo > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Bernard > > > > > > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of > > John Meskes > > > Sent: Mon 27/03/2006 10:32 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] LAM/MPI > > > > > > I rebuilt the lam-7.1.2-oscar.spec and lam-switcher-modulefile.spec > > > using the headnode, and rpm -qa shows several Torque > > modules installed. > > > I did a full reinstall, and still have the same [FAILED] results. > > > > > > On 24 Mar 2006 at 17:25, Bernard Li wrote: > > > > > > > Did you build the new LAM/MPI on a server with TORQUE installed? > > > > > > > > If not, then you will have this issue. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Bernard > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > > > > John Meskes > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 17:26 > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] LAM/MPI > > > > > > > > > > --- lam/lamtest.err --- > > > > > /var/spool/pbs/mom_priv/jobs/16.master.SC: line 21: laminfo: > > > > > command not > > > > > found > > > > > > > > > > ERROR: LAM/MPI does not appear to have the tm boot SSI module! > > > > > This test script will now abort. > > > > > ------------ > > > > > but when I run laminfo, I get a full screen of output. > > > > > And if I run pbs_script.lam manually it gets past that point. > > > > > I've even copied laminfo into a path'd directory /usr/local/bin > > > > > > > > > > On 24 Mar 2006 at 16:15, Bernard Li wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Have you looked at the error logs to see why they all > > > > > failed? They are > > > > > > located in /home/oscartst. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > Bernard > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of > > > > > > > John Meskes > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 16:13 > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] LAM/MPI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, I managed to hack the Makefile, so now lam 7.1.2 and > > > > > > > friends install through the > > > > > > > wizard, and Step 1 thru 7 run nicely (except the > > ENV{DISPLAY} > > > > > > > problem mentioned > > > > > > > elsewhere) > > > > > > > But, Step 8 Test Cluster Setup > > > > > > > LAM/MPI (via Torque) [FAILED] > > > > > > > Everything else in the top part passed, including > > > > > > > MPICH (via Torque) [PASSED] > > > > > > > PVM (via Torque) [PASSED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the stuff on the bottom part failed. > > > > > > > Running Installation tests for pvm > > > > > > > [PASS] pvmd-path-ls.apt > > > > > > > [FAIL] envvar-pvm_arch.apt > > > > > > > [FAIL] envvar-prv_root.apt > > > > > > > [FAIL] pvmd-path-which.apt > > > > > > > [PASS] modulecmd-path-ls.apt > > > > > > > [FAIL] pvm-module-list.apt > > > > > > > [FAILDEP] [pvm-module-show.apb] > > > > > > > [FAILDEP] pvm-module-list.apt] > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
