OK, this error was seen during 4.0 testing. I guess Benoit never corrected it.
-- David N. Lombard My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation. >-----Original Message----- >From: Bernard Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:00 AM >To: Lombard, David N; Mark Hamrick; [email protected]; >Benoit des Ligneris >Subject: RE: [Oscar-users] FC2, Step 4 install Failure. > >Hey guys: > >I have seen this problem before - it only happens if you run the >start_over script and then re-run the OSCAR installation process. As >far as I could tell, it doesn't cause any problem. > >Cheers, > >Bernard > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Lombard, David N >> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:10 >> To: Mark Hamrick; [email protected]; Benoit >> des Ligneris >> Subject: RE: [Oscar-users] FC2, Step 4 install Failure. >> >> From: Mark Hamrick; Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:01 AM >> > >> >Hello everyone, >> > >> >I went back, did a complete reinstall of FC2 again, with the >> workstation >> >option set. I got through most of it fine, until I got to Step 4 >> >again. This time, when I started OSCAR, I noticed a new warning: >> > >> > >> >patching file /usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/Tk/Image.pm >> >Patching systeminstaller so that it support fedora Applying patch >> /opt/oscar/packages/sis/scripts/fedora.patch/distinfo.patch >> >patching file usr/share/systeminstaller/distinfo/Fedora/stages >> >Applying patch >> /opt/oscar/packages/sis/scripts/fedora.patch/Image.pm.patch >> >patching file usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/Image.pm >> >Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1. >> >Hunk #2 FAILED at 19. >> >Hunk #3 FAILED at 31. >> >2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file >> >usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/Image.pm.rej >> >SIS patch for fedora done >> >--> Successfully ran server >> >> In theory, this can't happen, but there's nothing so >> practical as a good theory, is there? >> >> At any rate, the problem occurred when an OSCAR-provided >> Fedora-specific patch was applied to a file from the >> systeminstaller-x11 rpm. What's confusing here is that your >> log shows this rpm was, in fact, installed by OSCAR -- so, >> the patch should match the target. >> >> I would not be surprised to see an error such as this if you >> had a different version of the systeminstaller-x11 rpm, but >> that doesn't appear to be the case. >> >> Would you post the .rej file? >> >> Benoit, this is your patch, do you have any comments? >> >> -- >> David N. Lombard >> >> My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & >> candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=ick >> _______________________________________________ >> Oscar-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users >> ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Oscar-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
