> >While i wouldn't say people are breaking ndas by arguing against it, i > >also wonder why this topic is so controversial. Ewww.. i smell > >politics.. > > > I don't think that's the case at all - I think we're just trying to come > to a concensus of where the information should go. > > It's not an "open source flash project" and there shouldn't be linked > from the main navigation. It should probably be linked from the MTASC > page, but if anything it really belongs under an MTASC_API page, with > sections for Flash 6, Flash 7, and Flash 8.
I think you're mistaken : it's not new API for MTASC, it's new API for Flash 8 :) The fact that MTASC enable you to use it is just another thing, since you can do the same using an hexadecimal editor or some other tools to change SWF header version. Think about it about "open source tutorial on Flash8 features" <adversing>you can now compile it using mtasc -version 8 :))</advertising> > I'm not trying to stop the information from being available, but I don't > think osflash is the right place for it. Again, osflash is open source > Flash-related projects, but something like undocumented features really > belongs on a general purpose flash wiki. We have already stated on this point. Why you didn't react the same way when the LocalConnection stuff was posted ? > It really belongs on the FlashCoders wiki, but it's a shame that wiki > has been shut down. Perhaps it's time to start a new wiki for this type > of information, as well as things like more undocumented features, best > practices, tips and tricks, etc. It would just split things, it's more convient to have this on one Wiki. FlashCoders wiki is dead, long life to OSFlash wiki. [...] > I don't want to see osflash lose it's focus. Well I guess as Flash developers, we're focused on Flash8 right now ;) Nicolas _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
