> Exactly. This is about the integrity and consistency of osflash wiki, and NOT about supressing information. > > Flash8 APIs are not MTASC APIs. MTASC does little to > support them and does nothing to implement them. Furthermore, > these APIs are non-official and subject to change or removal.
Oh really ? Would Macromedia remove announced new features ? Or maybe feel like changing them just of few weeks before releasing the IDE, after all the private beta have been done ? Please stop with the FUD. > OSFlash has a very specific mission, which is to provide a > home for Flash-related open-source projects, to document > their usage and to push them into the public arena. The > connection between Flash8 information and MTASC is > tenuous to say the least. It's not up to you to decide or state what is or should be OSFlash "mission". > Including non-OS projects is a sensitive subject, only because > of the current reliance of FAMES on FlashOut. If not for that > project the there would be no page for "Closed-Source > Flash Tools"... This is the thin end of a wedge, and the Flash 8 > page is driving it in further. How ? I don't understand what you mean by that. How is Flash8 API comparable to Flashout ? Is Flash 8 API "Closed source" ? Maybe it was a few hours ago, but now it's wide open. Nicolas _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
