yes, original look and width="100%" gets my vote for the moment too underlined links instead of buttons works better for me. clean.. but the evolving nature is great too .. bound to end up just right!
On 30/11/05, Carlos Rovira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMHO, > > ...I don't want to hurt feelings in this list, although the style and > logo is good looking I don't think that's the look and feel of a > serious movement like osflash. People trying to enter the SWF world > could not take us seriously due to this kind of look. > > But it's only my opinion. I agree with Adam Robertsont that the > original look (the white one) was for me the best option at the > moment. > > ...Hope I don't hurt anyone with my thoughts but I'm trying to look > things from outside of our world and I can't get what's the intention > of that funky logo (that is great by the other hand and maybe for > other issues). > > Just an opinion. > > Cheers, > > C. > > > > 2005/11/30, John Grden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I don't agree about the links as buttons - on Red5, it was always a pain to > > have people find the "links". AT least with the buttons, people can pick up > > on them right away. I know it seems a bit "Romper room-ish" but, I like the > > fact that there's no mistake on where you can click. > > > > On 11/30/05, Mark Winterhalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Take a look: > > > > http://osflash.org > > > > > > cool. i like. > > > the old one was good, too, but i believe this one better reflects the > > > openness of a wiki. what i don't like, though, is that "links as > > > buttons" thing. i prefer links as... links. the old fashioned way. > > > > > > also, about the header graphics: > > > stealing an idea from flashgamecoders.com, how about some small flash > > > works in there? > > > max 10k or something like that, developed with OS tools only, and > > > limited to flash7 (until we linux users get the new plugin)? with > > > downloadable source, of course. > > > > > > mark > > > > > > > > > On 11/30/05, Aral Balkan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > I had some free time today (the eye of the storm, no doubt) and > > > > lightened up the OSFlash design a bit. My emphasis is to make it > > > > easy-to-read and as clean as possible. (And hey, let's reflect the funky > > > > character of the community and the graffiti-like nature of the wiki > > > > while we're at it too why don't we?) :) > > > > > > > > Take a look: > > > > http://osflash.org > > > > > > > > An update on the mascot contest, btw: I am going to be working with the > > > > entrants on a different design -- one of which we will choose. It's very > > > > important that we get the mascot right as it will reflect the character > > > > of OSFlash so I am being overly anal about it. Please bear with us a > > > > little longer on that one. > > > > > > > > I hope you enjoy the new design! > > > > > > > > Aral > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > osflash mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > http://snafoo.org/ > > > jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > osflash mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > John Grden - Blitz > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > -- > ::| Carlos Rovira > ::| http://www.carlosrovira.com > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
