I must agree with Ralf, with the lasts versions of MTASC (.8 to .11) maintain compatibility is not a pain like it was in the past. But you should check it periodicaly compiling with MMC to ensure this.
2005/12/8, Ralf Bokelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I know a lot of big projects, which don't have problems with mmc > compatibility. What problems do you have with yours? > r. > > > iiley wrote: > > > Thanks for your reply Scott.;] > > Yup, i think it is not a priority before too, but when our project > > becomes larger and larger, it's harder and harder to fix it to > > compatible with MMC. > > I don't know whether you or other people get feel this -- it's very hard > > to make a big project compatible with MMC if you'v been developing it on > > FAME workflow for a long time. Not just the syntax problem.:) So, i > > suggest it be priority. > > > > Although, ActionStep is greate, awesome, i'v been paying attention to > > it since its born.:) > > > > Regards. > > > > /iiley > > > > 2005/12/9, Scott Hyndman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > > > Thanks Iiley, > > > > No, ActionStep isn't either. Maybe at some point we'll try to get > > this going...but it isn't a priority. > > > > Scott > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > -- ::| Carlos Rovira ::| http://www.carlosrovira.com _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
