Although I'm sure that FlashDevelop is evolving great (congrats!), I must make a point that I consider important. I continue working with ASDT due to a lot of points but mainly two: Java Integration and CVS Integration.
Working in a team and with RIAs with Java in the backend a similar IDE is needed. FDT is the only one with this kind of features, but is not OS and cost 200$. btw, and in others enviroments I'm sure FlashDevelop will suit the needs of most people. Great work guys!. Just me two... C. 2005/12/27, Allen, Christopher S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sönke Rohde wrote: > >> I am using Eclipse and FDT and setting up a new project just takes a few > >> minutes > Philipe wrote: > >Well, it takes about 2 minutes to download, install & launch > >FlashDevelop and 30 seconds to create your first project, or no time > >if you only need to edit (with full code completion) some .as files > >around your FLAs ;) > > >But I must concede that until mono.net has some solid WinForms > >implementation, FlashDevelop will only work under Windows... > > Yeah, I agree with Jesse and Sönke. Using Eclipse and MTASC is an > unbelievable > time-saver once you get things setup. I'm sure that FlashDevelop is as well. > > I would try FlashDevelop, but for me it doesn't seem worth it as I use Eclipse > all the time for Java development too. The way ActionScript, XML, XSLT, > JavaScript, and Java can all be edited, compiled, built and run so fluidly in > one environment makes whatever performance issues that Eclipse has not worth > mentioning. I also use SVN and VSS integration with Eclipse, and that is a > huge > advantage as well. > > Just me two pennies... > > -Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > -- ::| Carlos Rovira ::| http://www.carlosrovira.com _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
