1. Download and run the latest release from here: http://www.flashdevelop.org/community/viewforum.php?f=11
2. Yes, download and install the latest MTASC release. Install means "unzip to a folder". I put it in c:\mtasc 3. Then you need to set the MTASC path in FlashDEvelop. Hit F9 and go down to where it says ASCompletion.mtasc.path and enter the path where you installed it. 4. You probably have .net, but if you don't, you'll know soon enough :) 5. Code completion works out of the box. Press F7 to do an MTASC syntax check. 6. The -mx switch is an MTASC compiler switch that uses precompiled mx classes so you don't get all those errors. If you do a "Quick MTASC Build" in FD, it uses -mx by default. But if you do a Project Build, it doesn't, and currently there is no way to force it to do so. The plugin release he is talking about is an update that will handle that issue. It will be announced on the site when its ready. Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan Richter > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 9:33 AM > To: 'Open Source Flash Mailing List' > Subject: Re: [osflash] FlashDevelop: Project build and -mx parameter > > What exactly do I need to download and install for a > Flashdevelop setup? I presume I need MTASC if I want to use > that to compile plus the latest Flashdevelop download? > How do I know if I have or need the .Net 1.1 framework? Does > the code completion work out of the box or do I need to do > anything to make it work? > Does FD do live error checking like FDT? > > Philippe, you talk about an -mx switch fix and a plugin > release. What plugin is this and what does it do? Your forum > has several plugins and I do not know which one you are > referring to. Can you tell that I am already confused? :-) > > Stefan > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tan > > Sent: 28 December 2005 09:50 > > To: 'Open Source Flash Mailing List' > > Subject: Re: [osflash] FlashDevelop: Project build and -mx parameter > > > > Yes, .NET 1.1 is required. > > > > FlashDevelop is not trying to be Eclipse or Visual Studio, > it is not a > > monolithic solution to all your editing needs, which is one of the > > reason why FD is light-weight and responsive. > > > > I, too, miss some features such as XMLBuddy, java editting > capability, > > Ant integration in Eclipse. I still have Eclipse installed in my > > computer, but I only run the 800-pound gorilla when I need > to, rest, I > > am pretty content with FD for its better speed and intellisense. > > > > - Tangent > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralf Bokelberg > > Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 5:09 PM > > To: Open Source Flash Mailing List > > Subject: Re: [osflash] FlashDevelop: Project build and -mx parameter > > > > Hi Philippe, > > > > > Well, it takes about 2 minutes to download, install & launch > > > FlashDevelop and 30 seconds to create your first project, > or no time > > > > don't we need the .NET framework to run FlashDevelop? > > > > Cheers, > > Ralf. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
