hank williams wrote: >On 1/17/06, Ralf Bokelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Huh, not using Ant? >>What else could one use? >> >> >> > >EVERYONE DOES NOT USE ANT. > > > Some people use make, others gmake.. I actually use phing =) For any medium-size to big projects it's a Good Thing to use some kind of builder. For the same reason as using FAR in the first place, and a version control system..
On the subversion list there's also a question every now and then that the developers feel is outside the scope of the project and the developers responsibility to manage. If you don't agree, grab the source and do it yourself.. thats the beauty of open source Evert >>I'm not convinced, that MTASC could do better than Ant already does. >>Writing a little Ant Makro is done very fast and can be tailored by >>everybody, who knows XML. Also, if the compiler does it, he has to >>unpack with every compilation. Wouldn't this slow down compilation a lot >>? With ant we can unpack once and be done. >> >> > >It is probably true that for ant users what you suggest is more elegant. > >But everybody does not use ant. More importantly, sometimes you want >to try something and you dont want to have to worry about any ant >scripts. Java and eclipse are wonderful that way. There is nothing >wrong with a little ease of use every now and then - even smart/expert >people appreciate it. The flash work flow sucks compared to Java. >Every little bit helps. > >Regards >Hank > >_______________________________________________ >osflash mailing list >[email protected] >http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
