Hi Igor,
Why don't you compile your project with AsWing instrinsic-classes and load
and swf which all AsWing-Code before loading your content.swf?
Intrinsics compile lightspeed and this should save your 20-30secs.

Cheers,
Sönke

> Just one more idea.
> 
> I think it also will be very useful to have 
> "-rb_include_package <package>"
> option in addition to "-rb_exclude_package <package>". It will be very
> comfortable to create DDLs.
> 
> For example, I'm using AsWing in my project. Extra 
> compilation time for
> compile only used AsWing classes every time takes about 20-30 
> seconds for me
> (using MTASC). So I'd like to create a DLL and place all used 
> "org.aswing.*"
> classes to. Later I could load this DLL in runtime or import 
> using swfmill. 
> 
> But to create such DLL now I need to list all AsWing classes. 
> I need to keep
> this list alive and revisit it every time I'm adding or 
> removing some AsWing
> class from my sources. Also I don't want to create DLL 
> contained all AsWing
> stuff to omit list revisiting (it could be too heavy).
> 
> So having "-rb_include_package <package>" option I could 
> create special ANT
> task and run it only if I started to use new class from 
> AsWing framework. It
> will create DLL for me contained only classes used in my 
> project. And I
> don't need to recompile all sources anymore after any tiny 
> changes in my own
> sources.
> 
> What do you think about?
> 
> Regards,
> Igor
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Simon Wacker
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 4:20 PM
> To: Open Source Flash Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [osflash] FAR was [Hacked MTASC: ask for new feature]
> 
> Hi Ralf,
> 
> it is definitely possible to do this in ant, but it is much more 
> convenient to use if you do not have to do it, but let the 
> compiler do 
> the job for you. ;) (and let's not forget about the 
> programmers that do 
> not use ant)
> 
> 
> Greetings,
> Simon
> 
> Ralf Bokelberg wrote:
> 
> >Yes, that's what i understood also.
> >But i wonder, why we should do it inside MTASC, when we can 
> do it in ant 
> >also? Couldn't we add a dependent target, which unzips a 
> library.zip and 
> >adds the directory to the classpath of mtasc?
> >Cheers,
> >Ralf.
> >
> >Carlos Rovira wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Hi Ralf,
> >>
> >>Ant would be useful to package the classes into a FAR file, 
> but I think 
> >>that Igor wants HAMTASC recognize that file and be able to 
> asimilate it 
> >>(I suppose hamtasc must unpack and process the files inside it)
> >>
> >>If not, please Igor, give your vision
> >>
> >>FAR file would be a great addition to our arsenal ;)
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>
> >>C.
> >>
> >>
> >>2006/1/17, Ralf Bokelberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
> >>
> >>    Hi Igor,
> >>
> >>    sounds interesting.
> >>    If i would implement it, i would unpack the zip into a temporary
> >>    directory and add the name of the newly created directory to the
> >>    classpath. I wonder, if this can't be done more easily with Ant?
> >>
> >>    Cheers,
> >>    Ralf.
> >>
> >>    Igor V. Sadovskiy wrote:
> >>
> >>     > Hello Ralf.
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     > I'd like to ask you about adding new feature to the 
> MTASC. It's FAR
> >>     > (Flash Archive) support. FAR is just like a JAR in Java. It
> contains
> >>     > archived AS sources and could be used as element of the
> >>    classpath. To my
> >>     > mind it will be great if MTASC and most of well-known IDE
> >>    supports it. I
> >>     > could place all third-party libraries to FAR file so 
> my project
> >>    becomes
> >>     > quite compact and portable. Libraries packed to the 
> archive could
> be
> >>     > easy shared between projects, easy added to the CVS. Library
> version
> >>     > control will become really easier. It even will be 
> possible to
> >>    use Maven
> >>     > with library repository to build Flash applications.
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     > I already talked with some peoples from OSFlash about (Simon
> Wacker,
> >>     > Carlos Rovira and other) and they found this idea 
> interesting too.
> As
> >>     > soon as this feature will be implemented we could 
> push this idea
> >>    to the
> >>     > flash community. I think all will find FAR useful. 
> Also we will
> >>    ask for
> >>     > FAR support by the top used IDE. I think it won't be 
> a big issue to
> >>     > implement this feature in some IDE.
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     > So what do you think about? Could you add FAR support to the
> >>    Hacked MTASC?
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     > Regards,
> >>     >
> >>     > Igor
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>
> >>    _______________________________________________
> >>    osflash mailing list
> >>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>    http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>::| Carlos Rovira
> >>::| http://www.carlosrovira.com
> >>
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>osflash mailing list
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >osflash mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> -- 
> Simon Wacker
> www.simonwacker.com
> www.as2lib.org
> www.hq-heilbronn.de
> www.flik-flak.de
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> 


_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to