Hi Peter, I think there's a difference between having good ties and being part of something. If you say you're an Adobe User Group, you're an Adobe User Group. I believe there is a place for Adobe User Groups and OSFlash User Groups (and there was definitely a need expressed by the community, in response to which they are being set up, again, by the community.) If it's an Adobe User Group, I guess it would be an Adobe Open Source Flash User Group but I can't see how that would be related to OSFlash.
Thoughts? Aral Peter Elst wrote: > Macromedia/Adobe has IMHO been incredibly supportive of the osflash > movement -- think it could prove to be a valuable asset to the > usergroup program to have a different branch of usergroup, like an > MMUG or CFUG but now rather an OSUG. > > Must say I haven't found running an MMUG has in any way restricted us > in terms of what we can present or talk about and has the benefit of > being affiliated with the mothership. This is just my own view on > things, feel free to disagree. We're not trying to reinvent Flash here > and working as closely together with Adobe as possible can only > benefit us in the long run and avoid FUD from being generated. > <snip> _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
