Hi Robert, I donty have handy the nellis archive. what I am seeing now with the archives from TV is solid work. I took in the code and the most suspitious place is the seam detection which I think is not quite right (the archives I work with are extended with new trpage nodes so this code is not int use). Could you place the Nellis db somewhere I can download it? I will have a look and will fix it
Let me know -Nick On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Robert Osfield <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Thanks for the clean up, the code looks a lot cleaner now :-) > > I've merged the changes and checked them in to svn/trunk. > > After merging the changes I tested osgviewer against the old Nellis > demo database archive.txp and found two issues, one of which is > clearly a regression. My test was: > > cd Nellis > osgviewer archive.txp > # zoom into the see the model > > First issue, a warning emited to the console a made be related to a > recent merge of a submission last week on achive creation/destruction > from David Fries (r11999). The warning on the console is: > > txp::ReaderWriterTXP::getArchive() error: archive id 1 not found: > "/archive.txp" > remove archive 1 size 0 result 1 > > The second issue is that cracks are appearing between tiles when > zooming in. This could be related to the above. I reverted your > clean up changes and to see if they were causing the regression and > confirmed that they aren't, so the changes I've just merged don't look > like they are related at all to the two above issues. > > Are you seeing any of these issues? > > Robert. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > I went thru the TileMapper today very carefuly and I remove all the > > tileStack approach - it made everything simplier and I think more proper. > > Cleaned the code as well. It was tested on huge archive with many lods as > > well with variable lods. Fix attached. > > > > I swear, with this no more issues will be reported ! > > > > Updated code attached. Please CI into svn, I will call again for testing > > (the community is silent though :-) .. is this so acient so noone is > using > > it anymore? :) > > > > Cheers, > > -Nick > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Okay > >> -Nick > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Robert Osfield > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Nick, > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Trajce (Nick) Nikolov > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > So, good time to call the community to do tests. If all ok, then I > >>> > clean it > >>> > >>> Could you do the call for testing and coordinate the thread as I've > >>> got a number of other issues to juggle with right now. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Robert. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> osg-submissions mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osg-submissions mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > osg-submissions mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org >
_______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
